Technology diligence · AI software · Product strategy
What makes an AI software business defensible?
Locate the advantage in the customer workflow, usable data, product integration and delivery capability. Ask what remains valuable as models and competitors improve.
Locate the advantage in the product
For an AI software acquisition, begin with the part of the customer’s work that the business makes meaningfully better. Then identify what enables that result and how easily a competitor could reproduce it.
Look at the complete workflow. Where does the product get its inputs? What useful output does it produce? How does that output reach the next person or system? An advantage can sit in the information available to the product, its integration into daily work or the team’s ability to deliver a dependable result.
Make the advantage specific. “AI-powered” describes a capability. A defensibility claim should explain why a customer would continue choosing this product when other suppliers can access similar models.
Ask what survives a better model
Consider a competitor using the same underlying model and common development tools. Identify the parts it would still need to build, obtain permission to use or earn from customers.
For data, examine relevance, freshness and permitted uses alongside ownership. A large archive becomes commercially useful when the product can apply the right information to a valuable task. Customer-specific data may improve one customer’s experience while remaining unavailable for broader use.
Ask who benefits when another participant joins. The OECD distinguishes network effects that increase users’ value from switching costs tied to investments that are difficult to transfer. A useful individual workflow, a difficult migration and a network that improves other participants’ outcomes provide different explanations for continued use.
For a proposed data advantage, trace the mechanism from permitted new information to a product change and then to a useful outcome for another customer. Identify what evidence supports each step. More accounts or a larger archive leaves that learning process unproven; examine the improvement separately from the effort required to leave.
For the product, look at integrations, accumulated configuration, working relationships and the quality of the completed workflow. For the team, look at its ability to maintain those connections and turn changing technology into usable releases.
Stronger models can improve the product and make competing features easier to build at the same time. Keep both effects in the product plan.
Connect the advantage to the next decision
Evergences’ acquisition work for a content business connected AI capabilities, technical foundations and competitor capabilities with commercial risks and opportunities. Those connections make the technology discussion useful to an acquisition team.
Turn each important finding into a product or operating priority. The next investment might be better access to existing data, a deeper integration, a more reliable workflow or a focused engineering hire.
Prioritize the work that strengthens the reason customers choose the product. That gives the acquisition team a clearer link between the advantage it is buying and the work required to sustain it.